Perspectives of biopolitical analysis on university

Keywords: Biopolitics, University, Government

Abstract

An analysis of university governance and management is presented from a biopolitical perspective, aiming to comprehend the current transformations and challenges that universities face as social institutions. The biopolitical approach allows for distinguishing the university from other institutions of higher education, endowing it with particular characteristics and functions. Analyzing university governance from this standpoint enables conceiving the university as part of a network of higher education institutions, but also as a unique and autonomous educational entity. The concept of biopolitics, developed by Michel Foucault, is revisited, wherein it is utilized to scrutinize the relationship between the State and the biological life of the population. It is posited that universities, akin to other institutional systems, are subject to power dynamics and control mechanisms that influence their organization and operation. The problem focuses on analyzing the implications of applying biopolitical analysis to university governance, in order to understand the forms of power that operate within it and that sustain it as a particular and universal institution at the simultaneously. A genealogical methodology is employed to analyze the historical development of the university and its management in the contemporary era. One of the findings is that biopolitics demonstrates how institutional decisions impact social and biological life, influencing the population through values and practices based on the idea of the human, thereby inviting a reevaluation of university resistances and decisions in education and society.

Author Biographies

María Fernanda Varela Valdés, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.

She has a degree in sociology and a master's and doctorate in pedagogy, both from UNAM. She has published several texts such as “Perception and Experience through the screen, published by UPN and has participated in academic events such as ‘Artistic movements, political movements? and ’Creativity as a social phenomenon in art” both organized by the FES Acatlan.

Zaira Navarrete Cazales, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.

Full-time Professor in the area of Educational Research in the Department of Pedagogy of the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters of the UNAM. Professor and tutor in the Graduate Program in Pedagogy, and in the Graduate Program in Gender Studies, also at UNAM. National Researcher of the SNII-Conahcyt, Level II. Doctor in Sciences in the Specialty of Educational Research by the DIE-Cinvestav-IPN. Winner of the “Arturo Rosenblueth Award 2016”, for best doctoral thesis in the area of Social Sciences and Humanities; and winner of the Distinction Recognition National University for Young Academics 2023 in the area of Teaching in humanities of the UNAM. Her lines of research are: 1) Construction of identities, 2) Professional training in universities, technological and normal schools, 3) History and perspective of pedagogy, 4) Policies for inclusion, innovation and uses of ICT in education, 5) Comparative and international education, and 6) Agenda 2030 of UNESCO, analyzed from the perspective of Political Discourse Analysis and Comparative Studies. He is responsible or co-responsible for 5 collective research projects. She is part of ten Boards and Editorial Committees of specialized journals in Education, and is a reviewer in more than 20. She is Honorary President of the Iberoamerican Society of Comparative Education and Honorary President of the Mexican Society of Comparative Education-World Council of Comparative Education Societies, NGO of UNESC.

References

Agamben, Giorgio (2015) ¿Qué es un dispositivo? Anagrama, Barcelona.
Bazzicalupo L. (2016) Biopolítica. Un mapa conceptual, Editorial Melusina, España.
Castro E. (2005) El vocabulario de Michel Foucault, temas, conceptos y autores, Siglo XXI.
Foucault M. (2007) Nacimiento de la Biopolítica, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires.
Foucault M. (2006) Seguridad, Territorio y Población, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, Traducción: Horacio Pons.
Foucault M. (2002) Vigilar y castigar: nacimiento de la prisión, Siglo XXI Editores, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Foucault M. (2000), Defender la sociedad, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
Foucault M. (1990) “Omnes et singulatim: hacia una crítica de la «razón política»” en Tecnologías del yo, Paidós, Barcelona, pp. 95-140.
Foucault M. (1998) Historia de la sexualidad. Tomo 1. La Voluntad de saber, Siglo XXI, España.
Garcés, M. (2005). “La vida como concepto político: una lectura de Foucault y Deleuze”, Athenea Digital, 7, 87-104. Disponible en: http://antalya.uab.es/athenea/num7/garces.pdf
Guralnik, G E. (2014) “Orígenes de la biopolítica: la ciencia y la tecnología.” VI Congreso Internacional de Investigación y Práctica Profesional en Psicología XXI Jornadas de Investigación Décimo Encuentro de Investigadores en Psicología del MERCOSUR. Facultad de Psicología Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.
Humboldt, G., Escritos Políticos [Traducción de Wenceslao Roces], Fondo de Cultura Económica, México, 1996.
Le Goff J. (1996) Los intelectuales en la Edad Media, Gedisa, Barcelona.
Kant, I. (2003). El conflicto de las facultades. Madrid: Tecnos.
Lemke, T. (2017) Introducción a la biopolítica, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Ciudad de México.
Real Academia Española: Diccionario de la lengua española, 23.ª ed., [versión 23.5 en línea]. https://www.rae.es/drae2001/disciplina
Rüegg, W. (2004) A history of the University in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Inglaterra.
Salinas Araya, A. (2014) La semántica biopolítica. Foucault y sus recepciones, Cenaltes, Viña del Mar.
Sauquillo J. (1987) "Poder político y sociedad normalizada en Michel Foucault", en Revista de Estudios Políticos, núm. 56, abril-junio, pp. 181-203.
Sepúlveda, J. C. (2016) “Michel Foucault: Tecnologías de gobierno y prácticas de libertad. Últimos desplazamientos. Renovadas problematizaciones” en Perspectivas Metodológicas / 18 /Vol. II /Año 2016.
Tejeda González, J. L. (2011) “Biopolítica, control y dominación” en Espiral, Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad Vol. XVIII No. 52, Septiembre / diciembre de 2011.
Weber, M. (1990). La ciencia como vocación. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Varela Valdés, M. F., & Navarrete Cazales, Z. (2024). Perspectives of biopolitical analysis on university . Higher Education and Society Journal (ESS), 36(1), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.54674/ess.v36i1.904