Performance de l'enseignement supérieur brésilien en réponse aux nouvelles exigences de la

Mots-clés: Établissement d'enseignement supérieur; politique publique; impact social; indicateurs de performance

Résumé

Le présent article postule qu'un nouveau concept d'excellence académique est en train de remplacer progressivement la notion d'« universités de classe mondiale ». Ce nouveau paradigme est celui d'une université engagée. Ce paradigme émergent privilégie deux caractéristiques principales : premièrement, l'accent mis sur le développement de solides capacités de recherche et d'enseignement fondées sur les atouts naturels et les besoins de la région, et deuxièmement, la capacité à transférer efficacement les connaissances afin d'orienter les politiques publiques. Cette conception est née en réponse aux priorités et aux exigences imposées aux établissements dans la société contemporaine. Le paradigme dominant de classe mondiale pour les universités se voit accorder un niveau de priorité moindre par les principaux systèmes et établissements d'enseignement supérieur que ce n'était le cas dans le passé. Ce paradigme se caractérise par un ensemble relativement limité d'indicateurs quantitatifs, axés principalement sur la publication dans des revues universitaires prestigieuses, l'accumulation de citations et la production d'un groupe restreint de scientifiques de très haut niveau. Dans cet article, le paradigme actuel est d'abord examiné, ainsi que ses caractéristiques. Ensuite, une analyse est menée afin d'identifier les changements qui éloignent les établissements d'enseignement supérieur du modèle conventionnel. Enfin, une série de capacités institutionnelles et de changements visant à accroître la contribution aux politiques publiques est proposée sur la base de deux exemples internationaux.

Références

Altbach, P. G., Bal. (2007). World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America.

Altbach, P. G., Salmi, J. (2011). The Road to Academic Excellence: The Making of World-Class Research Universities. 1–219. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8805-1

Axelberg, J (2019) Iniciativas Nacionais de Excelência Acadêmica: China, Alemanha, Israel, Noruega e Coreia do Sul in Marcovitch, Jacques et al. (2019). Repensar a Universidade II : impactos para a sociedade. . Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração, Contabilidade e Atuária. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/9788571661967

Blasi, B., Romagnosi, S., Bonaccorsi, A. (2017). Playing the ranking game: Media coverage of the evaluation of the quality of research in Italy. Higher Education, 73(5), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-9991-1

Bornmann, L. (2013). ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SCIENCE What Is Societal Impact of Research and How Can It Be Assessed? A Literature Survey. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803

Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., Marx, W., Thor, A.. (2016). Which early works are cited most frequently in climate change research literature? A bibliometric approach based on Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y

Bosman, J., Debackere, K., Cawthorn, W., Galimberti, P., Graffner, M., Held, L., Hermans, K., Killard, F., Labastida, I., Millar, A., Robinson, M., Roser, K., Svendsen, M., & Wouters, P. (2024). Next Generation Metrics for Scientific and Scholarly Research in Europe. LERU. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11123148

Boswell, C., Smith, K. (2017). Rethinking policy “impact”: Four models of research policy relations. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0042-z

Bleiklie, I., Michelsen, S. (2022). The New Abundance of Policy Advice: The Advisory Roles of Political Scientists in Norway. The Advisory Roles of Political Scientists in Europe, 225–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86005-9_11

Champenois, C; Etzkowitz, H (2018) From boundary line to boundary space: The creation of hybrid organizations as a Triple Helix micro-foundation, Technovation, Volumes 76–77, 2018, Pages 28-39, ISSN 0166-4972, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.11.002.

CoARA (2022) Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment. Available from: https://coara.eu/app/uploads/2022/09/2022_07_19_rra_agreement_final.pdf

Coggo Cristofoletti, E, Salles-Filho, S, Juk, Y, Cabral, B, Pinto, K. E. F., Hollanda, S, Graziani, C & Pereira, C. (2024). A long and winding road: Research impact evaluation over public policies. Quantitative Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00345

Dabars, W.B., & Crow, M.M. (2015). Designing the New American University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/book.38428.

Dorta-Gonz’alez, P, Rodríguez Caro, A & Dorta-González, M. (2024). Societal and scientific impact of policy research: A large-scale empirical study of some explanatory factors using Altmetric and Overton. J. Informetrics. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2403.06714

Erkkilä, T., Piironen, O. (2020). What Counts as World Class? Global University Rankings and Shifts in Institutional Strategies. 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7598-3_11
Haunschild, R., Bornmann, L. (2017). How many scientific papers are mentioned in policy-related documents? An empirical investigation using Web of Science and Altmetric data. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1209–1216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2237-2

Goddard, John (2009), Reinventing the Civic University, London: NESTA.

Goddard J, Hazelkorn E, Vallance P (eds) (2016) The civic university: the policy and leadership challenges. Edward Elgar Publishing

Hazelkorn, E. (2007). The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making. Higher Education Management and Policy, 19(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1787/hemp-v19-art12-en

Hazelkorn, E (2008). Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking: The Experience of Institutional Leaders. Higher Education Policy, 21(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2008.1

International Monetary Fund (2024) Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Work available from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/Staff-Discussion-Notes/Issues/2024/01/14/Gen-AI-Artificial-Intelligence-and-the-Future-of-Work-542379?cid=bl-com-SDNEA2024001

Lem, P (2022) Is China taking an isolationist stance on higher education? in Times Higher Education, available from: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/china-taking-isolationist-stance-higher-education

Lewison, G., Sullivan, R. (2008). The impact of cancer research: How publications influence UK cancer clinical guidelines. British Journal of Cancer, 98(12), 1944–1950. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604405

Lingard, B. (2013). The impact of research on education policy in an era of evidence-based policy. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2013.781515

Lo, W. Y. W. (2014). Theorising University Rankings. 41–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-35-1_3

Marginson, S., van der Wende, M. (2007). To Rank or to be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11, 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303544

Mohrman, K., Ma, W., Baker, D. P. (2008). The Research University in Transition: The Emerging Global Model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300175

Ordorika, I, Lloyd, M (2015). International rankings and the contest for university hegemony. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2014.979247

Pang, L. (2018). How Tsinghua Became a World Class Research University: A Case Study on the Impact of Rankings on a Chinese Higher Education Institution.

Pielke, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511818110

Pusser, B., & Marginson, S. (2013). University Rankings in Critical Perspective. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 544–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777301

Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165

Rhoads, R. A., Li, S., Ilano, L. (2014). The Global Quest to Build World‐Class Universities: Toward a Social Justice Agenda. New Directions for Higher Education, 2014(168), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20111

Sabrina, T., Alessio, C., Chiara, A. et al. Civic universities and bottom-up approaches to boost local development of rural areas: the case of the University of Macerata. Agric Econ 9, 15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-021-00185-5

Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7865-6

Shin, J. C., Toutkoushian, R. K., Teichler, U. (2011). University rankings: Theoretical basis, methodology and impacts on global higher education.

Spruijt, P., Knol, A. B., Petersen, A. C., & Lebret, E. (2016). Differences in views of experts about their role in particulate matter policy advice: Empirical evidence from an international expert consultation. Environmental Science & Policy, 59, 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.02.003

Wilsdon, J., Allen, L., Belfiore, E., Campbell, P., Philip Campbell, Curry, S., Hill, S. A., Jones, R., Kain, R., Kerridge, S., Thelwall, M., Tinkler, J., Viney, I., Wouters, P., Hill, J., & Johnson, B. (2015). The metric tide: Report of the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.4929.1363
Publiée
2025-06-30
Comment citer
Axel Berg, J., Marcovitch, J., & de Moura Rocha Lima, G. (2025). Performance de l’enseignement supérieur brésilien en réponse aux nouvelles exigences de la . Journal De l’enseignement supérieur Et De La société (ESS), 37(1), 328-349. https://doi.org/10.54674/ess.v37i1.1005