Generative Artificial Intelligence Policies in Three Mexican Universities and Federal Actions: Challenges and Possible Pathways
Abstract
The emergence of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) has transformed the educational landscape, prompting higher education institutions to develop policies for its integration. This study analyzes how three Mexican universities—the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), the Ibero-American University (UIA), and the Monterrey Institute of Technology (ITESM)—have addressed this challenge, as well as the initial federal actions to guide public policy in higher education. A documentary analysis of comparative cases was conducted on the policy actions and instruments related to the adoption of GAI at these universities, as well as at the Secretariat of Public Education (SEP), which corresponds to the national ministry of education. Governance patterns, the timing of actions, and the policy instruments used were identified from a social systems perspective. The three institutions have implemented strategies that combine teacher training, regulatory guidelines, digital infrastructure, and multi-stakeholder governance mechanisms. The cases demonstrate a shift toward the need to develop flexible and collaborative policy-design models that subvert the traditional sequential nature of the public policy cycle.
References
Aguilar, L. (1992). Estudio introductorio. En Aguilar Villanueva, L. (ed). Problemas públicos y agenda de gobierno (pp. 15-72). M.A. Porrúa.
ANUIES (2025). Anuario estadístico de educación superior. Ciclo 2024-2025. https://bit.ly/4hIFsbT
Calvano, E., & Calzolari, G. (2025). AI and policy: What makes AI different? Economic Policy, 40(121), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiae067
Capraro, V., Lentsch, A., Acemoglu, D., Akgün, S., Akhmedova, A., Bilancini, E., … Viale, R. (2024). The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy-making. PNAS Nexus, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae191
Cejudo, G. y Michel. C (2016) Coherencia y políticas públicas. Metas, instrumentos y poblaciones objetivo. Gestión y Política Pública, 25 (1). 3-31. https://doi.org/10.29265/gypp.v25i1.149
Costa, F., Mónaco, J., Covello, A., Novidelsky, I., Zabala, X., y Rodríguez, P.. (2023). Desafíos de la inteligencia artificial generativa: Tres escalas y dos enfoques transversales. Question, 3(76), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.24215/16696581e844
Cruz-Rubio, C. (2012). La taxonomía del cambio: enfoques y tipologías para la determinación del cambio de las políticas públicas. Andamios, 9(20). 297- 321. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v9i20.382
del Tronco, J., y Paz-Gómez, D. (2022). De las herramientas de gobierno a los instrumentos de política. Un análisis de las estrategias frente al covid-19 en Sudamérica. Estudios de Derecho, 79(173). 241-272. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.esde.v79n173a10
DIE (2025a). Estrategia pedagógica para la adopción de la inteligencia artificial en la IBERO. Universidad Iberoamericana. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15345790
DIE (2025b). ¿Cómo crear un agente tutor? [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zC7thpTXWkM
Digital Education Council (2024). Global AI Student Survey 2024: AI or Not AI—What Students Want. Digital Education Council. https://bit.ly/3JsKRHn
Digital Education Council (2025). Global AI Faculty Survey 2025. Digital Education Council. https://bit.ly/4i2oq8V
DOF (2019). Ley general de educación. https://bit.ly/48X2lG9
Folorunso, A., Olanipekun, K., Adewumi, T., & Samuel, B. (2024). A policy framework on AI usage in developing countries and its impact. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Advances, 21(1), 154-166. https://doi.org/10.30574/gjeta.2024.21.1.0192
GAI-IAGEN (2023a). Módulo de colaboraciones en IA-GEN. https://iagen.unam.mx/iagenColabs.php
GAIA-IAGEN (2023b). Página principal. https://iagen.unam.mx/index.php
GAIA-IAGEN (2025). Recomendaciones para el uso educativo de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa en la UNAM.UNAM. https://bit.ly/43GOqR2
Gaceta UNAM (2023, 28 de agosto). Instalan grupo de trabajo sobre la inteligencia artificial. https://bit.ly/4qHLhKx
Galindo, J. (2008) Entre la necesidad y la contingencia. Autoobservación teórica de la sociología. Anthropos / UAM Cuajimalpa.
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. Societies, 15(1) pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Hosseini, M., Gao, P. & Vivas-Valencia, C. (2025). A social-environmental impact perspective of generative artificial intelligence. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 23 (100520). 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2024.100520
Hu, S. & Li, Y. (2024). Policy interventions and regulations on generative artificial intelligence. En Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 1034–1036). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3659122
IFE. (s.f.). Artificial Intelligence Global Education Network (AIGEN). https://bit.ly/4hHFPmV
IFE (2025). IFE Impact Report (marzo de 2024 a febrero de 2025). https://tec.mx/es/ife/impact-reports
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martínez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Khanal, S., Zhang, H., & Taeihagh, A. (2025). Why and how is the power of Big Tech increasing in the policy process? The case of generative AI. Policy and Society, 44(1), 52-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae012
Klyman, Katerina; Bao, Alice; Meinhardt, Christina; Zhang, Daniel; Cryst, Erin; Wald, Richard y Li, Fei (2024). Expanding Academia’s Role in Public Sector AI. Issue Brief. Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. Disponible en: https://hai.stanford.edu/policy.
LinkedIn & Microsoft Corporation. (2024, 8 de mayo). AI at work is here. Now comes the hard part [2024 Work Trend Index Annual Report]. https://tinyurl.com/2s3bbpvh
Liu, Y., y Wang, H. (2024, agosto). Who on Earth Is Using Generative AI? [Policy Research Working Paper, 10870]. The World Bank. https://tinyurl.com/v2z5ayc8
Luhman, N. (1996). Introducción a la teoría de sistemas. Universidad Iberoamericana.
Microsoft (2024). TECgpt: Enhancing Education with AI at Tec de Monterrey. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LBAhraLmq4&t=30s
OECD (2024). Assessing potential future artificial intelligence risks, benefits and policy imperatives. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers no. 27. OECD publishing. https://bit.ly/3JkKqil
Observatorio Interinstitucional de Inteligencia Artificial para la Educación Superior (OIIAES). (2025). Página principal. https://observatorio-ia.org/#sobre
Sarthou, N. F. (2015). Los instrumentos de política como enfoque de análisis de los sistemas de pago al mérito: Contribuciones analíticas a partir del caso argentino. Perfiles Educativos, 37(149).https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2015.149.5313 0
Statista (2025, 7 abril). Number of adults in the United States using generative artificial intelligence (AI) first for online search in 2023 and 2027. Statista. https://bit.ly/4qG9RLW
Subirats, J., Knoepfel, P., Larrue, C. y Varonne, F. (2008). Análisis y gestión de políticas públicas. Ariel.
UIA (2025, 24 octubre). Lanza IBERO su Ecosistema de Inteligencia Artificial con sentido humanista. https://bit.ly/4oWdfRb
UNAM (2024). Plan de desarrollo institucional de la UNAM 2023-2027. https://www.rector.unam.mx/docs/PDI-2023-2027.pdf
Universidad Veracruzana. (2025). Censo nacional “Usos y percepciones sobre la IAG”. https://bit.ly/4opcOiB
Tecnológico de Monterrey. (s.f.). Inteligencia artificial [IA]. https://bit.ly/4qHhxxt
Tecnológico de Monterrey. (s. f.). Conócenos. https://bit.ly/4nD8ECe
Tecnológico de Monterrey. (2025). TECgpt Open Edition. https://bit.ly/4orLu38
There's An AI For That. (2025, 7 abril.). There's An AI For That. https://theresanaiforthat.com/
Winner, L. (2001). ¿Tienen política los artefactos?. OEI. https://bit.ly/47ryuV6
Copyright (c) 2025 Mario Benavides Lara, Víctor Jesús Rendón Cazales, Luz Gisela Macías Carrillo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright notice
Copyright allows the protection of original material, and curbs the use of others' work without permission. UNESCO IESALC adheres to Creative Commons licenses in the open access publication of ESS. Specifically, texts published in this journal are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license: ESS is an open access journal, which means that all content is freely available to the user or their institution. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search or link to the full text of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author, always making sure to cite the author. Commercial use is not permitted. ESS requires authors to accept the Copyright Notice as part of the submission process. Authors retain all rights.
The full license can be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Attribution - NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0)
This journal does not charge authors for the submission or processing of articles. The authors of the contributions will receive acknowledgment of receipt that the work has reached the Editorial Team of the Journal.


.png)